Values
The Roosevelt dime is the same Sinnock design from 1946 to the present. The alloy changed in 1965. This page is the clad circulating type. Silver years live on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page. This page does not duplicate that mintage or value table.
A clad Roosevelt’s market depends on the date, the mint mark, and the grade. Melt is not a silver conversation here. Full Torch is a later conversation. This page is a series reference, not a price list.
The G, VF, and MS-63 columns sit in the mintage chart below. Those figures are from the NGC US Coin Price Guide, retrieved 2026-08-23, for the clad type dates NGC printed in this pass. They are a published guide, not an offer and not melt. A blank cell means that grade was not printed in this pass.
A dealer looking at the coin in hand will beat a guide number. If you are trying to sell a pile of them, start with how to sell a coin collection and the Ohio coin dealer directory.
Key Dates
PCGS CoinFacts does not name a traditional key date inside this series. This is a name list, not a price list. Do not invent one. Do not call 1965 a key because the alloy changed.
There is no key-date bolding on the mintage chart for that reason. A worn clad date is still clad.
Errors
These are named varieties. They are not extra pamphlet rows. This page will not invent a count.
Full Torch. That is a strike designation on the bands of the torch. It is not an error and not a G / VF / MS-63 cell. NGC prints a separate Full Torch listing. This chart does not copy those cells onto the business-strike column.
JS under the bust. Those letters are John R. Sinnock’s initials. They are not a variety and not an error.
1965 clad. The alloy changes. The design does not. That is not an error and not a key date.
1982 No P. NGC prints that variety. The mintage cell was blank, so it is name-only here.
This pass does not add Full Torch as extra value rows.
Compare the coin in hand to the NGC Coin Explorer Roosevelt page. We do not host their plates.
Varieties
Clad Roosevelt dimes keep the same design as the silver years. There is no second portrait on this page. A West Point mint mark is the variety guides name.
- 1996-WA West Point dime from the uncirculated set of that year. Guides list the W. It is a mint mark, not a new design. This page does not print a count.
Names follow PCGS CoinFacts and NGC, the same publishers this site already cites. This is a name list, not a price list and not a count.
Mintage
This chart is the clad circulating type, 1965 and later. Silver 1946–1964 mintages live on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page. This page does not duplicate that table.
Circulating 1965–1967 dimes have no mint mark. The 1974 Mint pamphlet still prints 1965 P and D manufacture cells. Those rows are mint of manufacture, not a letter on the coin. Later clad business strikes NGC left blank are the Wikipedia figures through 2024. 2025 stays off. 2026 is a different dime. 1996-W is a mint-set West Point listing, not a circulation row.
From 1968 the mint mark comes back on circulation strikes.
| Year | Mint | Mintage | NGC ID | G | VF | MS-63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | P | 690,590,000 Circulating 1965 dimes have no mint mark. Pamphlet P is manufacture. | 15130 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1965 | D | 617,457,120 Circulating 1965 dimes have no mint mark. Pamphlet D is manufacture. NGC prints one 1965 listing; values sit on 1965-P. | — | — | — | — |
| 1966 | P | 1,382,734,540 Circulating 1966 dimes have no mint mark. Count is NGC Coin Explorer. | 15131 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1967 | P | 2,244,007,320 Circulating 1967 dimes have no mint mark. Count is NGC Coin Explorer. | 15132 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1968 | P | 424,470,000 | 15133 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1968 | D | 480,748,280 | 15134 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1969 | P | 145,790,000 | 15135 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1969 | D | 563,323,870 | 15136 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1970 | P | 345,570,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1970 | D | 754,942,100 | 15138 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1971 | P | 162,690,000 | 15139 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1971 | D | 377,914,240 | 15140 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1972 | P | 431,540,000 | 15141 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1972 | D | 330,290,000 | 15142 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1973 | P | 315,670,000 | 15143 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1973 | D | 455,032,426 | 15144 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1974 | P | 470,248,000 | 15145 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1974 | D | 571,083,000 | 15146 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1975 | P | 585,673,900 | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | D | 313,705,300 | 15148 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1976 | P | 568,760,000 | 15149 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1976 | D | 695,222,774 | 15150 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1977 | P | 796,930,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | D | 376,607,228 | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | P | 663,980,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | D | 282,847,540 | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | P | 315,440,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | D | 390,921,184 | 15156 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1980 | P | 735,170,000 | 15157 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1980 | D | 719,354,321 | 15158 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1981 | P | 676,650,000 | 15159 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1981 | D | 712,284,143 | 15160 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1982 | P | 519,475,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | D | 542,713,584 | 15163 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1983 | P | 647,025,000 | 15164 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1983 | D | 730,129,224 | 15165 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1984 | P | 856,669,000 | 15166 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1984 | D | 704,803,976 | 15167 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1985 | P | 705,200,962 | 15168 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1985 | D | 587,979,970 | 15169 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1986 | P | 682,649,693 | 15170 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1986 | D | 473,326,970 | 15171 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1987 | P | 762,709,481 | 15172 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1987 | D | 653,203,402 | 15173 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1988 | P | 1,030,550,000 | 15174 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1988 | D | 962,385,488 | 15175 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1989 | P | 1,298,400,000 | 15176 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1989 | D | 896,535,597 | 15177 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $4 |
| 1990 | P | 1,034,340,000 | 15178 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1990 | D | 839,995,824 | 15179 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 1991 | P | 927,220,000 | 15180 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1991 | D | 601,241,114 | 15181 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1992 | P | 593,500,000 | 15182 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1992 | D | 616,273,932 | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | P | 766,180,000 | 15184 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1993 | D | 750,110,166 | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | P | 1,189,000,000 | 15186 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1994 | D | 1,303,268,110 | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | P | 1,125,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | D | 1,274,890,000 | 15189 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1996 | P | 1,421,163,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | D | 1,400,300,000 | 15191 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1997 | P | 991,640,000 | 15193 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1997 | D | 979,810,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | P | 1,163,000,000 | 15195 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1998 | D | 1,172,250,000 | 15196 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1999 | P | 2,164,000,000 | 15197 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 1999 | D | 1,397,750,000 | 15198 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.25 |
| 2000 | P | 1,842,500,000 | 15199 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2000 | D | 1,818,700,000 | 15200 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2001 | P | 1,369,590,000 | 15201 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2001 | D | 1,412,800,000 | 15202 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2002 | P | 1,187,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | D | 1,379,500,000 | 78728 | — | — | — |
| 2003 | P | 1,085,500,000 | 78730 | — | — | — |
| 2003 | D | 986,500,000 | 78731 | — | — | — |
| 2004 | P | 1,328,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | D | 1,159,500,000 | 78733 | — | — | — |
| 2005 | P | 1,412,000,000 | 78734 | — | — | — |
| 2005 | D | 1,423,500,000 | 78735 | — | — | — |
| 2006 | P | 1,381,000,000 | 78738 | — | — | — |
| 2006 | D | 1,447,000,000 | 78739 | — | — | — |
| 2007 | P | 391,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | D | 1,042,000,000 | 78749 | — | — | — |
| 2008 | P | 391,000,000 | 78752 | — | — | — |
| 2008 | D | 637,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | P | 96,500,000 | 822823 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2009 | D | 49,500,000 | 822829 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2010 | P | 557,000,000 | 822835 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2010 | D | 562,000,000 | 822839 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2011 | P | 748,000,000 | 822847 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2011 | D | 754,000,000 | 822851 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2012 | P | 808,000,000 | 822859 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2012 | D | 868,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | P | 1,086,500,000 | 822863 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2013 | D | 1,025,500,000 | 779124 | — | — | — |
| 2014 | P | 1,125,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | D | 4,155,600,000 | 822885 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2015 | P | 1,497,510,000 | 822891 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2015 | D | 1,543,500,000 | 822893 | $0.15 | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| 2016 | P | 1,517,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | D | 1,437,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | P | 1,437,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | D | 1,290,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | P | 1,193,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | D | 1,006,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | P | 1,147,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | D | 1,001,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | P | 1,333,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | D | 1,445,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | P | 1,349,250,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | D | 1,481,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | P | 1,551,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | D | 1,583,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | P | 1,410,500,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | D | 1,295,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | P | 307,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | D | 248,000,000 | — | — | — | — |
Mintage: United States, Bureau of the Mint, Domestic and Foreign Coins Manufactured by Mints of the United States, 1792-1965 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1974). Publisher: FRASER / GPO pamphlet.
Collector-standard year/mint presentation follows A Guide Book of United States Coins (the Red Book). These cells are Mint manufacture figures, not a Red Book net or melt.
Values: NGC US Coin Price Guide, retrieved 2026-08-21. Guide values, not offers. Not melt. NGC IDs link to the same publisher’s price-guide listing.
Key date names: PCGS CoinFacts (2026-08-21). Bold rows are only dates that publisher named.
NGC ID: NGC Coin Explorer listing number, retrieved 2026-08-21. A dash means this pass did not record an ID. 1965-D stays a dash. NGC prints one 1965 listing. Years NGC left blank stay off.
1965 pamphlet cells are dime manufacture. Circulating 1965–1967 dimes have no mint mark. Later clad counts are NGC Coin Explorer, retrieved 2026-08-23.
Silver 1946–1964 rows live on the pre-65 Roosevelt page. Business strikes NGC left blank are the Wikipedia Roosevelt dime mintage figures, retrieved 2026-10-06, through 2024. 2025 P/D dimes stay off. That page’s 2025 split is not the full year. 2026 is a different dime. 1996-W is a mint-set West Point listing, not a circulation row. 1982 No P stays a variety name without a count.
Full Torch is a designation, not a G / VF / MS-63 cell on this chart. SMS and set listings stay off. Guide cells retrieved 2026-08-23.
These are Bureau of the Mint manufacture figures from the 1974 GPO pamphlet for 1965, and NGC Coin Explorer counts for later clad dates on the chart, retrieved 2026-08-23, not a Red Book net or melt. The grade columns in the same box are NGC guide values from 2026-08-23, not an offer. Publisher links sit next to the chart.
Read the date. Read the mint mark left of the torch when there is one. Look at the bands before you argue Full Torch.
Specifications
These are mint specs, not what a dealer pays. Wear can take a little weight off. We will not invent a tolerance.
This page is the clad circulating Roosevelt. Catalogs also print the silver figures, so both sit in the box. The silver years themselves live on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page. Full Torch is a strike designation. That is not a spec change.
| Specification | Figure |
|---|---|
| Diameter | 17.91 mm |
| Thickness | 1.35 mm clad and silver |
| Weight | 2.268 g clad 1965–present; 2.50 g (38.58 grains) silver 1946–1964 |
| Composition | 1965–present is copper-nickel clad copper. 1946–1964 is 90% silver, 10% copper. |
| Fine silver | 0.07234 troy oz (1946–1964 only). Melt math uses this figure. It does not appraise a coin. |
| Edge | Reeded |
| Designer | John R. Sinnock |
Diameter and thickness are the U.S. Mint circulating-dime figures (17.91 mm / 1.35 mm) for both alloys. This page is the clad circulating type. Clad weight 2.268 g is the 31 U.S.C. § 5112 dime figure. The Numista clad type page (N#53) prints the same 17.91 mm / 1.35 mm / 2.268 g. Silver 1946–1964 is 2.50 g / 38.58 grains / .900 fine. Fine silver 0.07234 troy oz is the silver years only.
Grading
A Roosevelt dime wears first on Roosevelt’s cheek and hair, and on the bands of the torch. Full Torch is a strike call on those bands — a designation, not a G / VF / MS-63 cell.
This is still John R. Sinnock’s Roosevelt design from 1946 to the present. This page is the clad circulating type, 1965+. 1946–1964 90% silver lives on the pre-65 Roosevelt page. JS under the bust is Sinnock’s initials, not a variety.
Key Diagnostic Areas
| Area | What to examine | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Roosevelt’s cheek and hair | The cheekbone and the hair above the ear on the portrait. | Those high points flatten while the coat can still look busy. |
| Torch bands | The horizontal bands on the torch, and whether they are still separated. | The bands go slick first. Full Torch is a later strike conversation, not this grade. |
| Date and mint mark | The numerals under the portrait, and the mint mark left of the torch when there is one. | A worn date is a worn dime. Do not scrape the torch to force a mint mark. |
| JS initials | The letters under the bust. They are John R. Sinnock’s initials. | JS is the designer mark. It is not a variety and not a grade. |
Circulated & Mint State
These cards describe this coin, not a second copy of the P-1 through MS-70 chart. The shared numbers live on the glossary.
See graded photos. The photos that show what VF looks like live at PCGS. We do not host their plates. PCGS CoinFacts is the catalog page for this series. NGC Coin Explorer is another look if you want a second set. Guide values on this page came from the NGC Price Guide.
What each named grade looks like on this design.
Poor
Poor
A dime you can still call a Roosevelt if you already know the type.
- The cheek is gone. The torch is a lump.
- The date may be a shadow. Do not scrape it.
- Full Torch is not a conversation at this wear.
AG
About Good
You might read a digit. The high points are already slick.
- Hair and cheek are gone. The torch bands are not a conversation.
- If you cannot read the date without hoping, stay here.
- A 1968-D is still this grade if it is this worn.
Good
Good
The date is readable. The design is still mostly an outline.
- Roosevelt is a head, not a portrait. The cheek is flat.
- The torch is outlined. The bands have no real lines.
- The mint mark, if there is one, should still be findable left of the torch.
VG
Very Good
The date is clear. A little life returns in the hair and the torch.
- Some hair comes back. The cheek is still tired.
- The torch starts to show leftover bands. They are not split.
- Do not clean the date to “see it better.”
Fine
Fine
You can follow the portrait and the torch. The high points are outlined, not sharp.
- Hair is outlined. The cheek is not crisp.
- The torch shows leftover bands. They are still worn together.
- The date is clear. The mint mark should be too.
VF
Very Fine
The torch is doing real work. Cheek and bands still decide.
- Leftover strands in the hair. The cheek is not slick.
- More of the bands show. Full Torch is still not this grade.
- A regular 1968 is still this grade if it is this worn. The alloy change is not a grade.
EF
Extremely Fine
Most of the dime looks sharp. The cheek, the hair, and the torch bands tell on it.
- Light wear on the cheek, the hair, and the high points of the bands.
- The date is sharp. The mint mark left of the torch, if there is one, should be too.
- The rest of the coin can look better than the grade. Trust the high points.
AU
About Uncirculated
Almost no wear — and “almost” lives on the cheek and the torch.
- A trace of rub on the cheek and on the high points of the bands.
- The date should be full. Luster may still sit in the protected spots.
- A bright dime with a slick cheek is still a slick cheek.
Basal MS
Mint State
No wear. The fight is marks and luster, not how white the dime looks.
- No rub on the cheek, the hair, the torch bands, or the date.
- Full Torch is a strike call. It is not an extra MS-63 number.
- Marks and luster decide how this mint-state coin lives.
Choice
Choice Mint State
Still no wear. Cleaner fields than basal mint state.
- Same no-wear rule on the cheek, the torch, and the date.
- Fewer marks in the fields. Luster is more intact.
- Full Torch remains a designation, not a grade.
Gem
Gem Mint State
A clean cheek, torch, and fields for a Roosevelt. Still mint state, still not a story.
- No wear on the cheek or the torch bands.
- Marks and luster, not a romance about Full Torch copied onto MS-63.
- A slab is an opinion in plastic. The glossary has the numbers.
Proof Roosevelt dimes exist for part of the run. They were made as proofs. This page does not invent a PR price grid — NGC did not print one in the 2026-08-23 sheet used here. The proof numbers live on the glossary.
Copper color designations (BN, RB, RD) do not apply here. Those belong on copper coins such as the Indian Head cent. See the Lincoln Wheat cent and the glossary.
Overview
A Roosevelt dime is a United States ten-cent coin with Franklin D. Roosevelt on the front and a torch on the back, struck from 1946 to the present. The circulating type on this page is copper-nickel clad, 1965 and later. Same portrait. Same torch. The alloy changed in 1965.
Silver 1946–1964 — what people mean by pre-65 Roosevelt dimes — lives on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page.
People like them because the type still reads across a table. A worn clad dime is usually face value plus a dealer’s time. They are also easy to ruin. A wiped coin looks “better” to a seller and worse to everyone else.
This page is a series article, not a shop listing.
History
The series starts in 1946 with John R. Sinnock’s design. It replaces the Mercury dime. In 1965 the Mint changes the circulating dime to clad. The portrait stays. The alloy does not. That is not a key-date story.
This page will not invent a melt story that treats a 1965 dime like silver.
Design
Obverse: Roosevelt facing left, “LIBERTY,” “IN GOD WE TRUST,” the date, and JS under the bust. Reverse: a torch with an olive branch and an oak branch, “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,” “E PLURIBUS UNUM,” and “ONE DIME.” The mint mark sits left of the torch when the coin has one. Circulation strikes from 1965 through 1967 have none.
Look at the cheek, the hair, the torch bands, and the date. Those spots go flat first.
Full Torch means the bands on the torch are fully split. That is a strike call. It is not a G / VF / MS-63 number.
Proof Roosevelts exist for part of the run. They were made as proofs, not as circulation strikes that someone shined later.
People Also Ask
What years are Roosevelt dimes?
This page is the clad Roosevelt dime, 1965 through 2024. Silver 1946–1964 lives on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page. Business strikes NGC left blank are Wikipedia figures. 2025 stays off because that split is not the full year. 2026 is a different dime.
How much is a Roosevelt dime worth?
It depends on the date, the mint mark, the grade, and whether the coin is silver or clad. The G, VF, and MS-63 columns in the mintage chart are NGC guide values from 2026-08-23 for the clad type dates on this page, not an offer. Silver values live on the pre-65 page. A dealer looking at the actual coin will beat a guide number.
Are pre-65 Roosevelt dimes on this page?
No. 1946–1964 are 90% silver. Those years, mintages, and values live on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page. This page does not duplicate that chart. Same design. Different melt.
Is 1965 a key date?
No. 1965 is the first clad year. The pamphlet prints 1965 dime cells. An alloy change is not a key date. PCGS CoinFacts does not name a traditional key in this series, and this page will not invent one around 1965.
What is Full Torch?
Full Torch is a strike designation on the bands of the torch. It is not a G, VF, or MS-63 cell on this chart. Do not copy a Full Torch price onto the business-strike column.
Collector Considerations
Buy the coin, not the story. A pile of worn clad dimes is face value plus a dealer’s time. A pile of worn pre-65 dimes is often a melt conversation, and that chart lives on the pre-65 Roosevelt dime page.
If you inherited a jar, do not scrub the date to “see it better.” Keep them in the holders they arrived in, or in cheap cardboard flips, and take the box to a person who sees Roosevelt dimes every week. The coin dealer directory starts in Ohio. This site does not invent shop names to fill a paragraph.
Raw coins are fine. So are slabs. What is not fine is a coin that has been cleaned until the fields look like glass, then offered as “original.” Say what happened if you know. A dealer will see it anyway.
If you collect by type, one honest circulated clad Roosevelt will teach you the cheek and the torch on the current alloy. If you collect the silver years, use the other page.
For the dime this design replaced, read the Mercury dime page. For the dime before that, read the Barber dime.
A Final Word
Roosevelt dimes reward people who slow down. Read the date. Read the mint mark left of the torch when there is one. Look at the bands. Leave the polish under the sink. Do not call a 1965 dime silver because the face looks the same.
When you want another series on this site, the pre-65 Roosevelt dime, the Mercury dime, and the Barber dime are already here.
